At a parish I attended for Mass one
day this week the priest preached about following Our Lady’s lead and pondering
the life of the Lord in order to better recognise His hand at work and discern
what is and is not of God. He warned that, just as the Pharisees not only
failed to recognise Our Lord but even called His works demonic, so we can fail
in discerning what is of His hand, and even call things of God ‘demonic’.
I couldn’t help but
think how Catholics faithful to the rubrics and traditional catechesis are
often vilified as Pharisees, even by Pope Francis. One priest defended his
ignoring of liturgical norms by saying, “It’s because I think it’s more
important to care for people than follow cold rules written by some priests in
Rome who have never had parishes of their own”. He thus unwittingly accused
faithful priests–lauded by the housebound, the bereaved and those in crisis for
having been a rock and a balm in their suffering– as being completely
unpastoral and heedlessly following ways detrimental to persons. And here lies
another insult liturgically deviant clerics lodge: that it’s not simply that
Traditional priests don’t care about people, but that Rome doesn’t either! It
also supposes that the Roman Church is without insight and competency regarding
the good of the faithful.
In the widespread
liturgical deviancy that we encounter on an almost daily basis, the reason for
their deviancy is that Rome issues offensive liturgical texts –there is a clear
indication that some clergy think the Bible is politically incorrect or even
misogynist in that they insist on saying ‘Sisters and brothers’ rather than
‘Brothers and sisters’ or even the inclusive ‘Brethren’. I have even
heard the Beatitudes changed to ‘Blessed are the peacemakers; they shall be
called daughters and sons of God” (Matt.5v9). Are women really so easily
offended? Is Rome really misogynist? Are today’s Catholics so banal in their
language that they need a Jackanory text? It irritates me every Holy Thursday
when the Gospel says (when speaking of the Apostles) that when the soldiers
came to arrest our Lord “and they all ran away”. I much prefer to hear good
English: “And they fled”. I feel like fleeing from many a Novus
Ordo celebration when norms
are ignored and I am confronted (and I use that word deliberately) by a
‘performing priest’. Fathers, please just say the black and do the red. We of
the laity don't need theatrics to help us to pray: please stop getting
your personality in the way.
I cannot agree more Andrew I witness priests "performing" at most Masses now. It's bad enough inviting the sign of peace disturbing the prayerfulness even though Christ's peace has already been offered but most of them also leave the sanctuary and turn their back and walk away from the Lord who is present physically on the altar then, to go around the church and individually shake hands. Whilst their hearts are no doubt good their heads should surely be telling them this is not right and indeed not permitted. God Bless
ReplyDeleteThanks,
DeleteTheir hearts too should be saying 'This is not about my God being worshipped, but these people being pleased'.
God Bless.
"The good of the people"
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like a caring and loving thing to say but it often masks its true intention i.e
To appease the people
Or
To please the people
But the church is about the good of the soul first and formost and i believe that those errors of the modern world that seems to think that God is there to please and serve man rather than man is there to please and serve God has took root and spread within the church.
Its all very sad.
Thank you David.
DeleteExactly the point I was making to SallyAnne, but you have put it so much better!
God Bless.