Saturday, 8 October 2016

What could liturgically deviant priests be implying?

At a parish I attended for Mass one day this week the priest preached about following Our Lady’s lead and pondering the life of the Lord in order to better recognise His hand at work and discern what is and is not of God. He warned that, just as the Pharisees not only failed to recognise Our Lord but even called His works demonic, so we can fail in discerning what is of His hand, and even call things of God ‘demonic’.

I couldn’t help but think how Catholics faithful to the rubrics and traditional catechesis are often vilified as Pharisees, even by Pope Francis. One priest defended his ignoring of liturgical norms by saying, “It’s because I think it’s more important to care for people than follow cold rules written by some priests in Rome who have never had parishes of their own”. He thus unwittingly accused faithful priests–lauded by the housebound, the bereaved and those in crisis for having been a rock and a balm in their suffering– as being completely unpastoral and heedlessly following ways detrimental to persons. And here lies another insult liturgically deviant clerics lodge: that it’s not simply that Traditional priests don’t care about people, but that Rome doesn’t either! It also supposes that the Roman Church is without insight and competency regarding the good of the faithful.


In the widespread liturgical deviancy that we encounter on an almost daily basis, the reason for their deviancy is that Rome issues offensive liturgical texts –there is a clear indication that some clergy think the Bible is politically incorrect or even misogynist in that they insist on saying ‘Sisters and brothers’ rather than ‘Brothers and sisters’ or even the inclusive ‘Brethren’.  I have even heard the Beatitudes changed to ‘Blessed are the peacemakers; they shall be called daughters and sons of God” (Matt.5v9). Are women really so easily offended? Is Rome really misogynist? Are today’s Catholics so banal in their language that they need a Jackanory text? It irritates me every Holy Thursday when the Gospel says (when speaking of the Apostles) that when the soldiers came to arrest our Lord “and they all ran away”. I much prefer to hear good English: “And they fled”.  I feel like fleeing from many a Novus Ordo celebration when norms are ignored and I am confronted (and I use that word deliberately) by a ‘performing priest’. Fathers, please just say the black and do the red. We of the laity don't need theatrics to help us to pray: please stop getting your personality in the way.

4 comments:

  1. I cannot agree more Andrew I witness priests "performing" at most Masses now. It's bad enough inviting the sign of peace disturbing the prayerfulness even though Christ's peace has already been offered but most of them also leave the sanctuary and turn their back and walk away from the Lord who is present physically on the altar then, to go around the church and individually shake hands. Whilst their hearts are no doubt good their heads should surely be telling them this is not right and indeed not permitted. God Bless

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks,
      Their hearts too should be saying 'This is not about my God being worshipped, but these people being pleased'.
      God Bless.

      Delete
  2. "The good of the people"

    It sounds like a caring and loving thing to say but it often masks its true intention i.e

    To appease the people
    Or
    To please the people

    But the church is about the good of the soul first and formost and i believe that those errors of the modern world that seems to think that God is there to please and serve man rather than man is there to please and serve God has took root and spread within the church.

    Its all very sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you David.
      Exactly the point I was making to SallyAnne, but you have put it so much better!
      God Bless.

      Delete

Please comment using a pseudonym, not as 'anonymous'.
If you challenge the Magisterium, please do so respectfully.
We reserve the right to delete from comments any inflammatory remarks.
If we do not reply to your comment it is through lack of time rather than interest.