Three significant aspects
of Protestantism are the focus on the scriptures as the authority for belief and
practice; the private interpretation of scripture, and the focus on Jesus. Holding
to these allows for the ‘open table’ policy by which anyone who is dedicated to
scripture and Jesus is welcome at the Communion Table. In that the Church is
(for Protestants) not a divinely established institution but a fellowship of
believers (‘the invisible church’), the Church plays little or no part in their
theology. When it comes to belief and practice, each Protestant may simply ask
himself, “What would Jesus do/say?” which unfortunately but inevitably means
following a Jesus designed to their own taste.
Without a doubt, one
can go to any Protestant community and find the folk there to be sincere folk dedicated
to scripture and to Jesus Christ. Such formal Protestants are what I will call Honest Protestants: they know they reject belief in the Church as the ultimate authority on
earth in doctrine or morality.
There are also what I
call ‘Dishonest protestants’: persons who identify themselves as catholic
yet reject the Church’s authority and teaching on doctrine, moral issues and liturgical
discipline.
Such persons promote
the Culture of Death by happily supporting artificial contraception, abortion, civil
‘marriage’ after divorce, homosexual activity, euthanasia, et al. Indeed, they seek ways to accommodate such ‘lifestyles ‘choices’
into Catholic living so that they may welcome those who practice such lifestyles
to Holy Communion, thereby treating the Altar of God as akin to the Protestant
Table, and the Most Blessed Sacrament as akin to the (symbolic) Protestant Holy
Communion. They also see the desire women feel for the ordained ministry as 'a call of the Holy Spirit', as though he has changed his mind after 2000 years and was seeking to establish a new kind of Catholic Church not identifiable with its history and Tradition. I call such persons ‘Dishonest
protestants’ simply because they are protestant in belief and practice yet they
remain in the Catholic Church. They do not have the integrity that Formal
Protestants demonstrate. They are, in fact, quislings, whether they know it or
not, functionaries of the enemy by the very fact that they deny the Truth of
Catholic teaching and moral practice, and disorder her worship. only the Father of Lies (John 8v44) could seek to destroy Truth; and liturgical chaos cannot be of God who is not a God of disorder (1 Cor.14v33).
Liturgically, such catholics
refuse to follow Vatican II on the decreed retention of Latin and Gregorian chant.
Nor
will they follow the norms of the Reformed
(1970) Roman Missal, which puts the decrees of Vatican II into practice. They
refuse for example, to uphold the altar-facing celebration from the offertory
onwards, and reception of Holy Communion on the tongue as the norm (reception
on the hand is only by indult [indulgent permission from Rome]). They also
refuse to follow such norms as the restriction of Extraordinary Ministers to exceptional
circumstances (Sunday Mass is not an exceptional circumstance); the reservation
of purifications to the clergy; the prohibition of eulogies at Funerals; the
prohibition of laity giving talks/appeals from the lectern. They thus protest by
word and by deed against Catholic Truth and liturgical norms, and can
legitimately be called ‘Dishonest protestants’.
What we have in the Catholic
Church today is a great mass of such ‘Dishonest
protestants’. For them the Revealed Faith is easily put aside to follow the
changes in secular society. They give their obedience not to the Sacred Tradition
but to the prevailing sociological, psychological and political ideologies of
the day. It is these folk who happily support the culture of death and joyfully
ignore liturgical directives. As such, they show that they have implicitly abandoned
the Catholic Faith and thus the Catholic Church (to reject Sacred Tradition
they must also reject the Church, since
the Church holds Tradition to be a vehicle of Divine Revelation -in which many
of today’s ‘lifestyle choices’ are rebuked as intrinsically wrong).
There are many such
‘Dishonest protestants’ in the Catholic Church today. They may well be found at all levels
of the Church: in Rome and in episcopal residences, in presbyteries and in pews.
We can detect them whenever they say such things as ‘Tradition must be
reinterpreted in light of changing times’; ‘the scriptures must be
reinterpreted in light of advanced knowledge’, or ‘the Pope can change anything
he wants because he is the Pope’. Another give-away are the mantras of ‘God
loves you as you are’, which permits or even encourages the absence of penance
and reform; and ‘What would Jesus do/say?’, by which they speak from emotion (which
they label ‘the heart’) and not from reason (conscience). They thereby formulate
a new faith for themselves and the world under a mistaken understanding of the authority
of a Pope.
Unfortunately for
them, no Pope is God; a Pope can only exercise legitimate authority over the
Church when he acts in accord with
Tradition. Those catholics who expect Pope Francis to side with them
(or to ‘get alongside’) by abandoning long-held moral teaching in discipline
(practice) if not actually in doctrine, are asking him to formally abandon the Faith
delivered once for all to the saints. Yet Francis has professed himself a loyal
son of the Church, so I wait for the day when he shows ‘Dishonest protestants’
(dissenting catholics) that they are wrong about him and about the Faith,
which he can do by upholding Traditional doctrine and vetoing any pastoral procedures
or disciplines at odds with that Doctrine. His opportunity to do this comes
with the 2015 Synod. Pray for him, that as a loyal son of the Church he may remain unwaveringly united in mind
and heart to the Lord Jesus Christ, Who alone is The Way, The Truth, and The Life.
A Glossary of Terms
Honest Protestant: one who identifies as a Protestant and thus rejects the Catholic Church in
her teaching and discipline; a person who demonstrates integrity.
Dishonest Protestant: one who identifies as a Catholic yet rejects the Catholic Church in her
teaching and discipline; a person who lacks integrity and demonstrates
duplicity.
Well explained Father. I attended a meeting a few months ago of a 'Catholic' organisation who told us that in order to survive 'the Church must change' presumably to what they themselves want. They seem to be trying to undermine the Church from inside rather than leaving it for a Protestant community.
ReplyDeleteI went there in order to verify what I had read about them and when I filled in a form there in answer to 'Do you intend coming to more meetings' I put down a definite 'No.' I had found out that what I had read was indeed true.
Thank you, Pelerin.
DeleteIn my opinion, those who reject Catholic teaching and feel free to celebrate liturgy as they like it, should do the honourable thing and become Formal (Honest) Protestants.
God Bless.
Thank you Father. There are so many dishonest protestants.
DeleteThabk you, MMH.
DeleteDishonest protestants can be in a cassock, religious garb or in the pews, and while they may be sincere about their beliefs, there is no sincerity in staying in a Church with which they profoundly disagree.
God Bless.
Brilliant post, Father. I'll have to adopt the term "dishonest protestant." It's less likely to be misunderstood than the term "modernist." I don't understand why those who disagree with Church doctrine remain in the Church, especially when the Anglican Communion is tailor-made for them. They can have our "Catholic Protestants" and we'll take their "Anglo-Catholics." The Personal Ordinariate is waiting for them.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Philip.
DeleteYes, whenever we speak of modernists people think we may those who seek any kind of change rather than the heresy of Modernism.
I agree that they have a 'church' tailor made for them: the Anglican Communion. That they have not become Anglicans leads one to speculate that they stay formally Catholic simply in order to change the Church, having lost their Faith in it they see it as malleable to the age and not holder of a Divine Revelation to be guarded and handed on integrally.
God Bless.
It is tradition and doctrine that holds the Church together. Any watering down of doctrine and practice weakens the Church and makes its members more vulnerable to attacks of the devil.
ReplyDeleteSadly it seems that Francis in connection with the upcoming Synod does not want submissions rooted in doctrine. This policy is hard to understand.
I agree that doctrine (which is transmitted via Scripture, Tradition and the Magisterium) holds the Church together. I wonder if Francis is not just seeing where the bishops are actually going astray in their current practice by their responses in order to rebuke bad practice? If his Apostolic Exhortation affirms sound practice we will have our answer. I do know that many think Francis is at the root of a disordered new direction, but time alone will tell.
DeleteGod Bless.
You know, Fr Gary, even in our own diocese it seems as if it is thought that we are 'in good fettle' whereas (in my opinion) we look to be on the brink of disaster. While our own Church leaders are so blinkered how are we to see real progress other than through prayer?
ReplyDeleteI think most Catholics think we are doing OK and simply up-dating the faith and its practice under God's divinely appointed and guided leadership. They are wrong; the desire to be accepted by the world has meant an abandoning of the Faith, and I venture to say this was encouraged and facilitated by the changes to the most sacred of all things (The Mass). What was once unchanging has become the subject of a personal manipulation; it went from being a unifying (Latin) Sacrifice which was God directed to a tower of Babel (vernacular) liturgy celebrated people-facing as though the people are the ones to whom we are to focus our attention. Michael Davies wrote: "we have undergone a revolution rather than a reform since the Council. Professor Peter L. Berger, a Lutheran sociologist, insists that no other term will do, adding: "If a thoroughly malicious sociologist, bent on injuring the Catholic community as much as possible had been an adviser to the Church, he could hardly have done a better job." Professor Dietrich von Hildebrand expressed himself in even more forthright terms: "Truly, if one of the devils in C.S. Lewis' The Screwtape Letters had been entrusted with the ruin of the liturgy he could not have done it better."
Deletehttp://www.ad2000.com.au/articles/1989/jun1989p17_640.html
God Bless.
Wow! What a cracker of a post Fr Dickson. Once again you have exposed the chaotic mentality of the disaffected, liberal and progressive Catholics in the Church. Especially those leaders who have their hearts set on modernizing the mystery of the Church. How absurd. I salute you Fr Gary. Keep up the good work.
ReplyDeleteThank you Greg.
DeleteI think they expose themselves, to be honest, as having lost the faith.
thank you for the salute, but postpone it until I live as well as I can speak! I am not compromising in my pastoral care in terms of applying doctrine, but I do need to be more patient, more prayerful, more industrious (less irritable, more hard-working and more prayerful). Thanks be to God He uses even the most weakened (broken?) of instruments!
God Bless.