Thursday 13 March 2014

The Synod -Is The Cat out Of The Bag?

Little more can be said about the forthcoming Synod if Cardinal Kasper’s reported words are correct, i.e., that if the Synod does not change things there is no point in having it. Such words indicate a predetermined outcome on the horizon, which does not leave much room for the Holy Spirit to guide the proceedings and may even extend to a resistance of the Holy Spirit. We can only pray that His presence and guidance is irresistible to the participants.

We have perhaps all have occasion to suspect a Parish Pastor or Diocesan Bishop of calling a meeting simply to tick the box of consultation, but such consultation and the programmes which follow are local and not geared towards alteration of the Doctrine and/or discipline of the Universal Church. If a Roman Synod is being called simply to tick the box of consultation, that is disreputable and dangerous; disreputable because we are not talking about a pastoral or administrative programme within a locality but of the universal discipline of the most holy things on earth: the Sacraments; it is dangerous because it exposes souls to the flaws of a human, emotion-led agenda.

If there are participants coming to the Synod who are consciously seeking to alter the constant practice of the Church and her teaching on the unacceptability of re-marriage, they are going to bring the Synod dangerously close to putting souls in jeopardy by seeking to allow them to live in conflict with Christ Who is Truth. Such participants would be rightfully taking note of the emotional pain suffered by many and seeking to alleviate that pain, but alleviate it by giving primacy in pastoral care to care of the emotions rather than to care of the soul, and it is souls we must save.

I hope directives that hold together both Truth believed and Truth lived can be discerned under the guidance of the Holy Ghost; it is not impossible. But I suspect it could only be done by reference to Internal Forum solutions where the invalidity of a marriage is morally certain but cannot be publicly proven. Unfortunately, such solutions are open to abuse by unscrupulous souls (people and pastors) which puts their souls in danger, and in any case cannot be applied to same-sex pairings.


Good people are indeed suffering much pain at being unable to receive the sacraments, a pain which cannot leave any priest unmoved, but any directives must hold together Truth believed and Truth lived; we cannot be allowed to live contrary to the Truth. While we must not pre-judge what the Holy Ghost can do at the Synod, or indeed the openness of the participants to hearing Him, that they may come to the Synod with a predetermined outcome is disturbing since it is the Ten Commandments, the pronouncement of Christ in the Gospel and the constant teaching of the Church they will have to over-ride to facilitate an outcome that is incompatible with the integrity of the most holy things on earth -the sacraments. The eternal good of souls is at stake here, not simply their happiness on earth.

8 comments:

  1. Dear Father

    Yes indeed, that sense of a predetermined outcome is very troublesome.

    It is heartening for us as lay people to be able to read the Church's teachings being so clearly articulated as you do here.

    We live in strange times when Jesus Christ is being increasingly sidelined in His own Church.

    God bless
    Alan and Angeline

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you to both of you!
      There are many from top to bottom on the Church who hold to the Church's teaching and good pastoral care. They are not even so quick to be public, but they are there working away for the Lord anyway.
      God bless.

      Delete
  2. "We have perhaps all have occasion to suspect a Parish Pastor or Diocesan Bishop of calling a meeting simply to tick the box of consultation"

    THE LILY


    "The martyrs were bound, imprisoned, scourged, racked, burnt, rent, butchered —and they multiplied." St. Augustine



    NO BURNING, TEARING

    SCOURGING SKIN

    IT'S PSYCHOLOGICAL

    ALL WITHIN.



    NO ROTTING FLESH

    OR PUTRID BLOOD

    IT'S STERILE, CLEAN

    NO RANCID CRUD



    FOR BUTCHERED,

    TORTURED,BOUND UP SKINS

    REVEALS THE TRUTHS

    OF BISHOPS SINS.



    THEY WANT IT NICE,

    THEY WANT IT HUSHED,

    WITH VEINS OF ICE

    GOOD SOULS ARE CRUSHED.



    THE SILENT COLD

    IS BETTER YET

    FROZEN, SOLID

    CAN'T BEGET.



    FOR MARTYRED BLOOD

    REVEALS THE CHURCH,

    BLIND SOULS SEE TRUTH

    AND END THEIR SEARCH.



    "WE CAN'T HAVE THAT!"

    THE BISHOPS' SAY,

    "SO LET'S IGNORE...

    THEY'LL GO AWAY.


    ENLIGHTENED MEN,

    DON'T SCOURGE THE SKIN.

    ENLIGHTENED MEN

    KEEP BLOOD WITHIN."



    BUT THEY FORGOT

    THE WOMAN BLEEDS

    AND MONTHLY MAKES

    A BED FOR SEEDS



    WHERE "NICE" AND "HUSHED"

    THEY'LL GROW TO MEN

    AND SEIZE THE OARS

    FROM WRISTS THAT BEND...



    ON PETER'S BARK

    WHERE BLOOD STILL FLOWS

    FROM WOMAN'S WOMB...

    THE LILY GROWS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment.
      We are entering a new phase of martyrdom in the Church. Sadly, is is often enacted by those within it upon her most faithful and devoted members.
      God Bless.

      Delete
    2. I love The Lily. I have read it over and over again. It is really good. Thank you for it.

      Delete
    3. Thank you brandsma.
      I think many more than just yourself have enjoyed the poem.
      God Bless

      Delete
  3. If we're honest, it was never in the "bag". The whole approach, in my view, has been most unholy, unedifying - scandalous. The questionnaire read like it had its source in dissenting lobby groups, not the holy bishops whose duty it is to teach, govern and sanctify according to the deposit of Faith and morals.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you Lynda.
    I agree. That a predetermined end was always sought is a most unholy act. The questionnaire gave an indication of this in that it seemed very heavily weighted towards getting the answers wanted by dissenting groups. But God is greater than them all in the end...
    God bless.

    ReplyDelete

Please comment using a pseudonym, not as 'anonymous'.
If you challenge the Magisterium, please do so respectfully.
We reserve the right to delete from comments any inflammatory remarks.
If we do not reply to your comment it is through lack of time rather than interest.