The saga of the Franciscans of the Immaculate
continues, and the latest developments (which I’m sure all will have seen on the
ever-vigilant and well-informed Rorate Caeli).
Upon reading the latest developments one cannot
help but ask but what is happening in Rome since the election of Pope Francis: are those with an aversion to
Tradition taking advantage of his liberal public image to attack and destroy
Tradition? One may legitimately ask from where such aversion to Tradition arises:
is it from lack of love for the Church; from a fear of (or an actual abhorrence of) Tradition, or from a disordered loyalty to Vatican II in which there is a simple
inability to read the said Council in the light of all previous Councils?
Whatever the cause, anyone seeking to suppress Tradition
is by that very fact seeking to establish a new Church cut off from Her past; a
Church with its own (new) form of worship, its own (new) doctrine and its own (new)
disciplines. Such folk may think they are developing ancient worship and doctrine, but they can only make
such a claim if the said developments are in harmony with what has gone before.
If they are not in harmony with what has gone before they are not developments
but distortions; they are errors inspired by the father of lies.
Certainly it might be good to know the names of
anyone directing, facilitating and approving attacks against Tradition, but
names or no names I feel sure Rome will want to found bearing in mind the words spoken
by Gamaliel and which can be profitably applied by Rome to her relationship with
all the Traditional Communities:
"...take care what you do to these men. Some time ago,
there was a rebellion under Theudas who became notorious. He claimed to be someone
important, and even collected about four hundred followers; but when he was
killed all his followers dispersed. And then there was Judas the Galilean at
the time of the census. He also attracted crowds of supporters, but he too was
killed, and all his followers dispersed. What I suggest therefore is this: that
you not to interfere with these men but let them go. If this movement of theirs
is of human origin it will break up of its own accord, but if it is from God
you will not only be unable to stop them, you might find yourselves fighting
God." cf Acts 5v34-39.
At the end of the day, since the Traditional
communities are doing and teaching nothing that the Church has not done and
taught for centuries they are doing what has always been regarded as holy, and
the Church has no authority to suppress what is holy. Indeed those with
authority will surely be taking into account the words of St Paul too: “Maybe I have taken rather too much pride in
our authority, but the Lord gave
us that authority for building you up,
not for knocking you down” (2 Cor,10v8) and “That is why I am writing this while still far away, when I am with you
I shall not have to be harsh, with the authority that the Lord has given me, an authority that is for building up and not
for breaking down” (2 Cor, 13v10).
speak more!it is terrible that rome has done this to the holy fathers of the franciscans of the immaculate.what on earth is in their minds ?is the devil at work here?our blessed lady said so much at la sallette.i am worried .philip johnson.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment, Philip.
DeleteI think the suppression of Tradition is beyond human evil; it is not men in Rome that are the problem so much as the devil and his minions who, by suppressing Tradition, suppresses the Word of God. As St Paul says, the Church's battle 'is not against flesh and blood but against principalities and powers; against the rulers of the world of this darkness' (Eph. 6v12). Certainly the battle can be a worry to us, but remember that in the end the powers of hell will not prevail (Matt.16v18).